HEAD-TO-HEAD EQUIPMENT SHOWDOWN

Ursus 1654 vs Zetor 12011

Specification differential, power-to-weight analysis, hydraulic benchmarks, and equipment decision guidance.

Different Measurement ProtocolsMeasurement standard or power basis is unspecified for one or both machines.
Ursus

Ursus 1654

Category: Farm

Ursus 1654
TRACTORCOMPARE.COM
Power158.2 HP
Weight13,051lbs
Pump FlowN/Agpm
Zetor

Zetor 12011

Category: Farm

Zetor 12011
TRACTORCOMPARE.COM
Power120 HP
Weight9,039lbs
Pump FlowN/Agpm

Decisive Performance Differentials

  • Ursus 1654 provides +4,012 lbs more unballasted traction mass

Multi-Axis Capability Radar

Normalized 5-pillar operational benchmark comparison

Ursus 1654
Zetor 12011
Engine PowerBallast MassHydraulicsDisplacementGear Versatility
Engine PowerRated Horsepower
158.2 HPvs120 HP
Ballast MassOperating Weight
13,051 lbsvs9,039 lbs
HydraulicsStandard Flow
Option Pack RequiredvsOption Pack Required
DisplacementEngine Liters
7.3 Lvs6.8 L
Gear VersatilitySpeeds / Range
16F / 8Rvs16F / 8R
FIELD PROVEN FOOTAGE SHOOTOUT

Dual Field Action & Powertrain Sound

Side-by-side operational field footage verified with computer vision & acoustic audits.

VLM Visual & Audio Audited
Ursus 1654
Duży URSUS 1654 jakiś taki mały?? Rozładunek ciągnika McCormick X8 - 310 KM | Czy będą testy?
Duży URSUS 1654 jakiś taki mały?? Rozładunek ciągnika McCormick X8 - 310 KM | Czy będą testy?
Takes (2):
Channel: move me adekWatch on YouTube
Zetor 12011
Zetor Crystal 12011
Zetor Crystal 12011
Takes (3):
Channel: Gyula NémethWatch on YouTube

Head-to-Head Specification Differential

Side-by-side technical parameters with calculated delta advantage & percent differentials

SpecificationUrsus 1654Zetor 12011Advantage Delta
Power & Output
Rated Engine Horsepower
158.2 HP
120 HP
-
PTO Horsepower (Tested)
139.5 HP
N/A
-
Traction Density Ratio
12.1 HP/1k lbs
13.3 HP/1k lbs
13.3 vs 12.1 HP / 1,000 lb (higher transport agility)
Dimensions & Weight
Base Operating Weight
13,051 lbs
9,039 lbs
+44.4%+4,012 lbs heavier
Engine Specs
Displacement
7.3 L
6.8 L
+0.5L larger displacement
Cylinders
6 Cylinders
6 Cylinders
-
Chassis & Drivetrain
Drive Configuration
4WD
2WD
-
Transmission System
two-speed power shift
two-speed power shift
-
Hydraulics & Implements
Rear SCV Remotes (Standard)
Optional / Standard
1 Valves
-
3-Point Hitch Category
Category II
Category II
-
✓Specifications independently cross-referenced with official OECD & Nebraska test codes.
Official Engineering Test Reports

Buyer Decision Export Tools

Export side-by-side data for forums, Excel spreadsheets, or dealer negotiations

AI MATCHUP ARBITER & FIELD WORKLOAD ADVISOR

Operational Field Verdict Matrix

Algorithmic suitability assessment cross-referencing Nebraska draft tests against four agricultural workloads.

Real-time Engineering Synthesis

Primary Tillage & Deep Chisel Plowing

Ursus Recommended

Ursus delivers higher base frame ballast (+4,012 lbs) to minimize tire wheel slip under deep draft implement drag.

Tractive efficiency in heavy soil depends heavily on static axle load rather than pure unballasted horsepower.

Large-Scale Air Seeding & Hydraulic Drills

Data Inconclusive

Dedicated remote circuit hydraulic flow ratings are incomplete. Direct comparative seeding capacity requires dealer-verified option build sheets.

Variable-rate air carts require independent remote valve pressure regulation without starving steering hydraulics.

Road Hauling & Grain Cart Chase Duty

Zetor Recommended

Zetor 12011 offers superior 13.28 HP/1,000 lb agility, reducing road fuel overhead on rapid grain bin transit cycles.

Higher agility power-to-weight ratios dramatically improve turnaround times during peak harvesting windows.

Soil Compaction & Wet Ground Flotation

Zetor Recommended

Zetor 12011 features a lighter footprint (-4,012 lbs), mitigating subsoil compaction and preserving soil porosity.

Preserving soil porosity and preventing hardpan buildup saves diesel fuel in subsequent years.
Fleet Manager Recommendation

Both machines demonstrate balanced engineering trade-offs in this equipment class. Base final fleet acquisition on local dealer servicing support, operator ergonomics, and implement compatibility.

Evidence Coverage72%Empirical Spec Depth

Decision Analysis & Editorial Verdict

Engine Decision Verdict

Both Ursus 1654 and Zetor 12011 are remarkably well-matched within this power bracket. The decisive purchasing decision should focus on dealer proximity, local service network reputation, hydraulic circuit options, and implement hitch requirements.

COMMERCIAL INVENTORY & PRICING

Request Authorized Dealer Best Quote & Availability

Skip the runaround. Receive competitive manufacturer incentive packages, verified stock status, and freight estimates from top regional dealers.

100% Free service • No purchase obligation
Matched to certified OEM franchise dealers near your ZIP
Fast response with seasonal cash discount & low APR bundles

Your contact details are encrypted and only transmitted to authorized machinery dealers matching your location.

COMMERCIAL MACHINERY DECISION TOOL

Equipment Financing & Monthly Payment Estimator

Model cash flows, estimated installment burdens, and financing differentials for agricultural leases or loans.

Zero Credit Impact Estimate
$
Financed: $192,000 after down payment
$
Financed: $108,000 after down payment
Down Payment20%
0%20% (Standard)50%
Annual APR5.99%
Financing Term Duration (Months)
Estimated Monthly Payment Differential
Ursus 1654$3,711 /mo
60 payments$222,660 total
Zetor 12011$2,087 /mo
60 payments$125,220 total
Estimated Monthly Delta:$1,624 /mo savings

*Indicative estimates based on standard Tier-1 agricultural commercial rates. Taxes, freight, attachments, and insurance not included.

Other Competitors in This Horsepower Tier

View All Ursus Alternatives →
CountyCounty 1184120 HP
Compare with 1654 →
ZetorZetor 11741120 HP
Compare with 1654 →
ZetorZetor 12011120 HP
Compare with 1654 →