HEAD-TO-HEAD EQUIPMENT SHOWDOWN

CaseIH Puma 165 (2007–2010) vs Deere 6M 200

Specification differential, power-to-weight analysis, hydraulic benchmarks, and equipment decision guidance.

Different Measurement ProtocolsMeasurement standard or power basis is unspecified for one or both machines.
CaseIH
Spec Winner

CaseIH Puma 165 (2007–2010)

Category: Farm

CaseIH Puma 165 (2007–2010)
TRACTORCOMPARE.COM
Power165 HP
Weight15,708lbs
Pump Flow48.7gpm
Deere

Deere 6M 200

Category: Farm • Production: 2024 -

Deere 6M 200
TRACTORCOMPARE.COM
Power217.3 HP
Weight19,180lbs
Pump FlowN/Agpm

Decisive Performance Differentials

  • CaseIH Puma 165 (2007–2010) provides +4.2 PTO HP more implement shaft power
  • Deere 6M 200 provides +3,472 lbs more unballasted traction mass

Multi-Axis Capability Radar

Normalized 5-pillar operational benchmark comparison

CaseIH Puma 165 (2007–2010)
Deere 6M 200
Engine PowerBallast MassHydraulicsDisplacementGear Versatility
Engine PowerRated Horsepower
165 HPvs217.3 HP
Ballast MassOperating Weight
15,708 lbsvs19,180 lbs
HydraulicsStandard Flow
48.7 gpmvsOption Pack Required
DisplacementEngine Liters
6.7 Lvs6.8 L
Gear VersatilitySpeeds / Range
19F / 6Rvs20F / 0R
FIELD PROVEN FOOTAGE SHOOTOUT

Dual Field Action & Powertrain Sound

Side-by-side operational field footage verified with computer vision & acoustic audits.

VLM Visual & Audio Audited
CaseIH Puma 165 (2007–2010)
New Case IH PUMA 165 Tractor
New Case IH PUMA 165 Tractor
Takes (2):
Channel: bigtractorpowerWatch on YouTube
Deere 6M 200
John Deere 6M 200 Review The Powerhouse of 6 family utility tractors
John Deere 6M 200 Review The Powerhouse of 6 family utility tractors
Takes (2):
Channel: Top Benefits of Agricultural MachineryWatch on YouTube

Head-to-Head Specification Differential

Side-by-side technical parameters with calculated delta advantage & percent differentials

SpecificationCaseIH Puma 165 (2007–2010)Deere 6M 200Advantage Delta
Power & Output
Rated Engine Horsepower
165 HP
217.3 HP
-
PTO Horsepower (Tested)
163.2 HP
159 HP
+2.6%+4.2 PTO HP (+2.6%)
Traction Density Ratio
10.5 HP/1k lbs
11.3 HP/1k lbs
11.3 vs 10.5 HP / 1,000 lb (higher transport agility)
Dimensions & Weight
Base Operating Weight
15,708 lbs
19,180 lbs
+22.1%+3,472 lbs heavier
Engine Specs
Displacement
6.7 L
6.8 L
+0.1L larger displacement
Cylinders
6 Cylinders
6 Cylinders
-
Hydraulics & Implements
Standard Hydraulic Pump Flow
48.7 gpm
N/A (Check Option Pack)
-
Rear SCV Remotes (Standard)
3 Valves
2 Valves
+1 extra standard remote circuits
3-Point Hitch Category
Category optional
Category IIIN
-
Chassis & Drivetrain
Drive Configuration
2WD (Optional 4WD)
4WD
-
Transmission System
full power shift
four-speed power shift
-
✓Specifications independently cross-referenced with official OECD & Nebraska test codes.
Official Engineering Test Reports

Buyer Decision Export Tools

Export side-by-side data for forums, Excel spreadsheets, or dealer negotiations

AI MATCHUP ARBITER & FIELD WORKLOAD ADVISOR

Operational Field Verdict Matrix

Algorithmic suitability assessment cross-referencing Nebraska draft tests against four agricultural workloads.

Real-time Engineering Synthesis

Primary Tillage & Deep Chisel Plowing

Deere Recommended

Deere commands superior frame weight (+3,472 lbs) for continuous draft traction in heavy gumbo soils.

Tractive efficiency in heavy soil depends heavily on static axle load rather than pure unballasted horsepower.

Large-Scale Air Seeding & Hydraulic Drills

Data Inconclusive

Dedicated remote circuit hydraulic flow ratings are incomplete. Direct comparative seeding capacity requires dealer-verified option build sheets.

Variable-rate air carts require independent remote valve pressure regulation without starving steering hydraulics.

Road Hauling & Grain Cart Chase Duty

Deere Recommended

Deere 6M 200 offers superior 11.33 HP/1,000 lb agility, reducing road fuel overhead on rapid grain bin transit cycles.

Higher agility power-to-weight ratios dramatically improve turnaround times during peak harvesting windows.

Soil Compaction & Wet Ground Flotation

CaseIH Recommended

CaseIH Puma 165 (2007–2010) features a lighter footprint (-3,472 lbs), reducing deep subsoil compaction during damp spring planting windows.

Preserving soil porosity and preventing hardpan buildup saves diesel fuel in subsequent years.
Fleet Manager Recommendation

Select CaseIH Puma 165 (2007–2010) for superior overall technical balance across evaluated field tasks.

Evidence Coverage80%Empirical Spec Depth

Decision Analysis & Editorial Verdict

Engine Decision Verdict

CaseIH Puma 165 (2007–2010) holds the specification advantage across verified metrics. For heavy field draft tasks, evaluate Puma 165; for operations sensitive to operating costs or implement compatibility, Deere 6M 200 remains a direct benchmark contender.

COMMERCIAL INVENTORY & PRICING

Request Authorized Dealer Best Quote & Availability

Skip the runaround. Receive competitive manufacturer incentive packages, verified stock status, and freight estimates from top regional dealers.

100% Free service • No purchase obligation
Matched to certified OEM franchise dealers near your ZIP
Fast response with seasonal cash discount & low APR bundles

Your contact details are encrypted and only transmitted to authorized machinery dealers matching your location.

COMMERCIAL MACHINERY DECISION TOOL

Equipment Financing & Monthly Payment Estimator

Model cash flows, estimated installment burdens, and financing differentials for agricultural leases or loans.

Zero Credit Impact Estimate
$
Financed: $192,000 after down payment
$
Financed: $192,000 after down payment
Down Payment20%
0%20% (Standard)50%
Annual APR5.99%
Financing Term Duration (Months)
Estimated Monthly Payment Differential
CaseIH Puma 165 (2007–2010)$3,711 /mo
60 payments$222,660 total
Deere 6M 200$3,711 /mo
60 payments$222,660 total
Estimated Monthly Delta:$0 /mo savings

*Indicative estimates based on standard Tier-1 agricultural commercial rates. Taxes, freight, attachments, and insurance not included.

Other Competitors in This Horsepower Tier

View All CaseIH Alternatives →
CountyCounty 1254125 HP
Compare with Puma 165 →
MahindraMahindra 9125125 HP
Compare with Puma 165 →
FendtFendt Farmer 312125 HP
Compare with Puma 165 →