TRACTORCOMPARE.COM
Independent Agricultural Machinery Decision & Sizing Authority
CaseIH Puma 165 (2007–2010) vs International Harvester 3488
Specification differential, power-to-weight analysis, hydraulic benchmarks, and equipment decision guidance.
CaseIH Puma 165 (2007–2010)
Category: Farm
International Harvester 3488
Category: Farm
Decisive Performance Differentials
- CaseIH Puma 165 (2007–2010) provides +50.6 PTO HP more implement shaft power
- CaseIH Puma 165 (2007–2010) provides +4,108 lbs more unballasted traction mass
- CaseIH Puma 165 (2007–2010) provides +21.7 gpm higher base hydraulic flow (+80.4%)
Multi-Axis Capability Radar
Normalized 5-pillar operational benchmark comparison
Dual Field Action & Powertrain Sound
Side-by-side operational field footage verified with computer vision & acoustic audits.
Head-to-Head Specification Differential
Side-by-side technical parameters with calculated delta advantage & percent differentials
| Specification | CaseIH Puma 165 (2007–2010) | International Harvester 3488 | Advantage Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| Power & Output | |||
Rated Engine Horsepower | 165 HP | 124 HP | - |
PTO Horsepower (Tested) | 163.2 HP | 112.6 HP | +44.9%+50.6 PTO HP (+44.9%) |
Traction Density Ratio | 10.5 HP/1k lbs | 10.7 HP/1k lbs | Tie |
| Dimensions & Weight | |||
Base Operating Weight | 15,708 lbs | 11,600 lbs | +35.4%+4,108 lbs heavier |
| Engine Specs | |||
Displacement | 6.7 L | 7.6 L | +0.9L larger displacement |
Cylinders | 6 Cylinders | 6 Cylinders | - |
| Hydraulics & Implements | |||
Standard Hydraulic Pump Flow | 48.7 gpm | 27 gpm | +80.4%+21.7 gpm flow |
Rear SCV Remotes (Standard) | 3 Valves | 2 Valves | +1 extra standard remote circuits |
3-Point Hitch Category | Category optional | Category II | - |
| Chassis & Drivetrain | |||
Drive Configuration | 2WD (Optional 4WD) | 4WD | - |
Transmission System | full power shift | hydrostatic | - |
Buyer Decision Export Tools
Export side-by-side data for forums, Excel spreadsheets, or dealer negotiations
Operational Field Verdict Matrix
Algorithmic suitability assessment cross-referencing Nebraska draft tests against four agricultural workloads.
Primary Tillage & Deep Chisel Plowing
CaseIH delivers higher base frame ballast (+4,108 lbs) to minimize tire wheel slip under deep draft implement drag.
Large-Scale Air Seeding & Hydraulic Drills
CaseIH offers continuous high-capacity hydraulic flow (48.7 gpm, +21.7 gpm advantage), effortlessly sustaining fan motors and down-pressure circuits simultaneously.
Road Hauling & Grain Cart Chase Duty
Both tractors exhibit matched power-to-weight agility (10.5 vs 10.69 HP/1,000 lb).
Soil Compaction & Wet Ground Flotation
International Harvester 3488 features a lighter footprint (-4,108 lbs), mitigating subsoil compaction and preserving soil porosity.
Select CaseIH Puma 165 (2007–2010) for superior tractive frame ballast and engine power reserves and hydraulic flow capacity across evaluated field tasks.
Decision Analysis & Editorial Verdict
CaseIH Puma 165 (2007–2010) holds the specification advantage across verified metrics, led by higher rated horsepower. For heavy field draft tasks, evaluate Puma 165; for operations sensitive to operating costs or implement compatibility, International Harvester 3488 remains a direct benchmark contender.
Request Authorized Dealer Best Quote & Availability
Skip the runaround. Receive competitive manufacturer incentive packages, verified stock status, and freight estimates from top regional dealers.
Equipment Financing & Monthly Payment Estimator
Model cash flows, estimated installment burdens, and financing differentials for agricultural leases or loans.
*Indicative estimates based on standard Tier-1 agricultural commercial rates. Taxes, freight, attachments, and insurance not included.