HEAD-TO-HEAD EQUIPMENT SHOWDOWN

County 1164 TW vs Massey Ferguson 299 (2002–2010)

Specification differential, power-to-weight analysis, hydraulic benchmarks, and equipment decision guidance.

Different Measurement ProtocolsMeasurement standard or power basis is unspecified for one or both machines.
County

County 1164 TW

Category: Farm

County 1164 TW
TRACTORCOMPARE.COM
Power111 HP
Weight9,300lbs
Pump FlowN/Agpm
Massey Ferguson
Spec Winner

Massey Ferguson 299 (2002–2010)

Category: Farm

Massey Ferguson 299 (2002–2010)
TRACTORCOMPARE.COM
Power128.2 HP
Weight9,634lbs
Pump FlowN/Agpm

Decisive Performance Differentials

  • Massey Ferguson 299 (2002–2010) provides +12.3 PTO HP more implement shaft power
  • Massey Ferguson 299 (2002–2010) provides +334 lbs more unballasted traction mass

Multi-Axis Capability Radar

Normalized 5-pillar operational benchmark comparison

County 1164 TW
Massey Ferguson 299 (2002–2010)
Engine PowerBallast MassHydraulicsDisplacementGear Versatility
Engine PowerRated Horsepower
111 HPvs128.2 HP
Ballast MassOperating Weight
9,300 lbsvs9,634 lbs
HydraulicsStandard Flow
Option Pack RequiredvsOption Pack Required
DisplacementEngine Liters
6.6 Lvs6 L
Gear VersatilitySpeeds / Range
16F / 4Rvs12F / 4R
FIELD PROVEN FOOTAGE SHOOTOUT

Dual Field Action & Powertrain Sound

Side-by-side operational field footage verified with computer vision & acoustic audits.

VLM Visual & Audio Audited
County 1164 TW
County 1164 TW
County 1164 TW
Takes (2):
Channel: Arjan KolkmanWatch on YouTube
Massey Ferguson 299 (2002–2010)
Experimentando Massey Ferguson 299 por 1 dia
Experimentando Massey Ferguson 299 por 1 dia
Channel: Alberto DumitWatch on YouTube

Head-to-Head Specification Differential

Side-by-side technical parameters with calculated delta advantage & percent differentials

SpecificationCounty 1164 TWMassey Ferguson 299 (2002–2010)Advantage Delta
Power & Output
Rated Engine Horsepower
111 HP
128.2 HP
-
PTO Horsepower (Tested)
105 HP
117.3 HP
+11.7%+12.3 PTO HP (+11.7%)
Traction Density Ratio
11.9 HP/1k lbs
13.3 HP/1k lbs
13.3 vs 11.9 HP / 1,000 lb (higher transport agility)
Dimensions & Weight
Base Operating Weight
9,300 lbs
9,634 lbs
+3.6%+334 lbs heavier
Engine Specs
Displacement
6.6 L
6 L
+0.6L larger displacement
Cylinders
6 Cylinders
6 Cylinders
-
Chassis & Drivetrain
Drive Configuration
4WD
4WD
-
Transmission System
two-speed power shift
Mechanical / PowerShift
-
Hydraulics & Implements
3-Point Hitch Category
Category II
Standard Hitch
-
✓Specifications independently cross-referenced with official OECD & Nebraska test codes.
Official Engineering Test Reports

Buyer Decision Export Tools

Export side-by-side data for forums, Excel spreadsheets, or dealer negotiations

AI MATCHUP ARBITER & FIELD WORKLOAD ADVISOR

Operational Field Verdict Matrix

Algorithmic suitability assessment cross-referencing Nebraska draft tests against four agricultural workloads.

Real-time Engineering Synthesis

Primary Tillage & Deep Chisel Plowing

Massey Ferguson Recommended

Massey Ferguson commands superior frame weight (+334 lbs) for continuous draft traction in heavy gumbo soils.

Tractive efficiency in heavy soil depends heavily on static axle load rather than pure unballasted horsepower.

Large-Scale Air Seeding & Hydraulic Drills

Data Inconclusive

Dedicated remote circuit hydraulic flow ratings are incomplete. Direct comparative seeding capacity requires dealer-verified option build sheets.

Variable-rate air carts require independent remote valve pressure regulation without starving steering hydraulics.

Road Hauling & Grain Cart Chase Duty

Massey Ferguson Recommended

Massey Ferguson 299 (2002–2010) offers superior 13.31 HP/1,000 lb agility, reducing road fuel overhead on rapid grain bin transit cycles.

Higher agility power-to-weight ratios dramatically improve turnaround times during peak harvesting windows.

Soil Compaction & Wet Ground Flotation

County Recommended

County 1164 TW features a lighter footprint (-334 lbs), reducing deep subsoil compaction during damp spring planting windows.

Preserving soil porosity and preventing hardpan buildup saves diesel fuel in subsequent years.
Fleet Manager Recommendation

Select Massey Ferguson 299 (2002–2010) for superior tractive frame ballast and engine power reserves across evaluated field tasks.

Evidence Coverage76%Empirical Spec Depth

Decision Analysis & Editorial Verdict

Engine Decision Verdict

Massey Ferguson 299 (2002–2010) holds the specification edge across verified benchmark criteria, led by higher rated horsepower. Consider 299 for demanding high-capacity field duties, while County 1164 TW provides a competitive footprint for alternative duty cycles.

COMMERCIAL INVENTORY & PRICING

Request Authorized Dealer Best Quote & Availability

Skip the runaround. Receive competitive manufacturer incentive packages, verified stock status, and freight estimates from top regional dealers.

100% Free service • No purchase obligation
Matched to certified OEM franchise dealers near your ZIP
Fast response with seasonal cash discount & low APR bundles

Your contact details are encrypted and only transmitted to authorized machinery dealers matching your location.

COMMERCIAL MACHINERY DECISION TOOL

Equipment Financing & Monthly Payment Estimator

Model cash flows, estimated installment burdens, and financing differentials for agricultural leases or loans.

Zero Credit Impact Estimate
$
Financed: $108,000 after down payment
$
Financed: $108,000 after down payment
Down Payment20%
0%20% (Standard)50%
Annual APR5.99%
Financing Term Duration (Months)
Estimated Monthly Payment Differential
County 1164 TW$2,087 /mo
60 payments$125,220 total
Massey Ferguson 299 (2002–2010)$2,087 /mo
60 payments$125,220 total
Estimated Monthly Delta:$0 /mo savings

*Indicative estimates based on standard Tier-1 agricultural commercial rates. Taxes, freight, attachments, and insurance not included.

Other Competitors in This Horsepower Tier

View All County Alternatives →
Advance-RumelyAdvance-Rumely OilPull E 30/6084 HP
Compare with 1164 TW →
ZetorZetor 842184 HP
Compare with 1164 TW →
ZetorZetor 844184 HP
Compare with 1164 TW →