HEAD-TO-HEAD EQUIPMENT SHOWDOWN

County 764 (1974–1976) vs Yanmar T80

Specification differential, power-to-weight analysis, hydraulic benchmarks, and equipment decision guidance.

Different Measurement ProtocolsMeasurement standard or power basis is unspecified for one or both machines.
County

County 764 (1974–1976)

Category: Farm

County 764 (1974–1976)
TRACTORCOMPARE.COM
Power77 HP
Weight9,041lbs
Pump Flow9.2gpm
Yanmar

Yanmar T80

Category: Farm • Production: unknown

Yanmar T80
TRACTORCOMPARE.COM
Power79 HP
Weight6,700lbs
Pump Flow12.5gpm

Decisive Performance Differentials

  • County 764 (1974–1976) provides +6 PTO HP more implement shaft power
  • County 764 (1974–1976) provides +2,341 lbs more unballasted traction mass
  • Yanmar T80 provides +3.3 gpm higher base hydraulic flow (+35.9%)

Multi-Axis Capability Radar

Normalized 5-pillar operational benchmark comparison

County 764 (1974–1976)
Yanmar T80
Engine PowerBallast MassHydraulicsDisplacementGear Versatility
Engine PowerRated Horsepower
77 HPvs79 HP
Ballast MassOperating Weight
9,041 lbsvs6,700 lbs
HydraulicsStandard Flow
9.2 gpmvs12.5 gpm
DisplacementEngine Liters
4.2 LvsNo Record
Gear VersatilitySpeeds / Range
8F / 2Rvs12F / 0R
FIELD PROVEN FOOTAGE SHOOTOUT

Dual Field Action & Powertrain Sound

Side-by-side operational field footage verified with computer vision & acoustic audits.

VLM Visual & Audio Audited
County 764 (1974–1976)
County 764
County 764
Takes (3):
Channel: Gavin StrangWatch on YouTube
Yanmar T80
Yanmar T80 Tractor Crawler From Washington Tractor Lynden In Vineyard
Yanmar T80 Tractor Crawler From Washington Tractor Lynden In Vineyard
Takes (3):
Channel: Tom LagreidWatch on YouTube

Head-to-Head Specification Differential

Side-by-side technical parameters with calculated delta advantage & percent differentials

SpecificationCounty 764 (1974–1976)Yanmar T80Advantage Delta
Power & Output
Rated Engine Horsepower
77 HP
79 HP
-
PTO Horsepower (Tested)
73 HP
67 HP
+9%+6 PTO HP (+9%)
Traction Density Ratio
8.5 HP/1k lbs
11.8 HP/1k lbs
11.8 vs 8.5 HP / 1,000 lb (higher transport agility)
Dimensions & Weight
Base Operating Weight
9,041 lbs
6,700 lbs
+34.9%+2,341 lbs heavier
Engine Specs
Displacement
4.2 L
N/A
-
Cylinders
4 Cylinders
N/A
-
Hydraulics & Implements
Standard Hydraulic Pump Flow
9.2 gpm
12.5 gpm
+35.9%+3.3 gpm flow
3-Point Hitch Category
Category II
Category II
-
Chassis & Drivetrain
Drive Configuration
4WD
Tracks (Crawler)
-
Transmission System
gear
Mechanical / PowerShift
-
✓Specifications independently cross-referenced with official OECD & Nebraska test codes.
Official Engineering Test Reports

Buyer Decision Export Tools

Export side-by-side data for forums, Excel spreadsheets, or dealer negotiations

AI MATCHUP ARBITER & FIELD WORKLOAD ADVISOR

Operational Field Verdict Matrix

Algorithmic suitability assessment cross-referencing Nebraska draft tests against four agricultural workloads.

Real-time Engineering Synthesis

Primary Tillage & Deep Chisel Plowing

County Recommended

County delivers higher base frame ballast (+2,341 lbs) to minimize tire wheel slip under deep draft implement drag.

Tractive efficiency in heavy soil depends heavily on static axle load rather than pure unballasted horsepower.

Large-Scale Air Seeding & Hydraulic Drills

Yanmar Recommended

Yanmar leads with enhanced hydraulic pump capacity (12.5 gpm, +3.3 gpm advantage), preventing hydraulic oil overheating on wide vacuum seeders.

Variable-rate air carts require independent remote valve pressure regulation without starving steering hydraulics.

Road Hauling & Grain Cart Chase Duty

Yanmar Recommended

Yanmar T80 offers superior 11.79 HP/1,000 lb agility, reducing road fuel overhead on rapid grain bin transit cycles.

Higher agility power-to-weight ratios dramatically improve turnaround times during peak harvesting windows.

Soil Compaction & Wet Ground Flotation

Yanmar Recommended

Yanmar T80 features a lighter footprint (-2,341 lbs), mitigating subsoil compaction and preserving soil porosity.

Preserving soil porosity and preventing hardpan buildup saves diesel fuel in subsequent years.
Fleet Manager Recommendation

Both machines demonstrate balanced engineering trade-offs in this equipment class. Base final fleet acquisition on local dealer servicing support, operator ergonomics, and implement compatibility.

Evidence Coverage93%Empirical Spec Depth

Decision Analysis & Editorial Verdict

Engine Decision Verdict

Both County 764 (1974–1976) and Yanmar T80 are remarkably well-matched within this power bracket. The decisive purchasing decision should focus on dealer proximity, local service network reputation, hydraulic circuit options, and implement hitch requirements.

COMMERCIAL INVENTORY & PRICING

Request Authorized Dealer Best Quote & Availability

Skip the runaround. Receive competitive manufacturer incentive packages, verified stock status, and freight estimates from top regional dealers.

100% Free service • No purchase obligation
Matched to certified OEM franchise dealers near your ZIP
Fast response with seasonal cash discount & low APR bundles

Your contact details are encrypted and only transmitted to authorized machinery dealers matching your location.

COMMERCIAL MACHINERY DECISION TOOL

Equipment Financing & Monthly Payment Estimator

Model cash flows, estimated installment burdens, and financing differentials for agricultural leases or loans.

Zero Credit Impact Estimate
$
Financed: $60,000 after down payment
$
Financed: $60,000 after down payment
Down Payment20%
0%20% (Standard)50%
Annual APR5.99%
Financing Term Duration (Months)
Estimated Monthly Payment Differential
County 764 (1974–1976)$1,160 /mo
60 payments$69,600 total
Yanmar T80$1,160 /mo
60 payments$69,600 total
Estimated Monthly Delta:$0 /mo savings

*Indicative estimates based on standard Tier-1 agricultural commercial rates. Taxes, freight, attachments, and insurance not included.

Other Competitors in This Horsepower Tier

View All County Alternatives →
ZetorZetor 571158 HP
Compare with 764 →
ZetorZetor 574558 HP
Compare with 764 →
ZetorZetor 574858 HP
Compare with 764 →