HEAD-TO-HEAD EQUIPMENT SHOWDOWN

CaseIH Steiger 500 vs Fendt 1165 MT

Specification differential, power-to-weight analysis, hydraulic benchmarks, and equipment decision guidance.

Different Measurement ProtocolsMeasurement standard or power basis is unspecified for one or both machines.
CaseIH
Spec Winner

CaseIH Steiger 500

Category: Farm

CaseIH Steiger 500
TRACTORCOMPARE.COM
Power500 HP
Weight39,492lbs
Pump Flow42gpm
Fendt

Fendt 1165 MT

Category: Farm • Production: 2017 -

Fendt 1165 MT
TRACTORCOMPARE.COM
Power637 HP
Weight42,692lbs
Pump Flow37gpm

Decisive Performance Differentials

  • Fendt 1165 MT provides +3,200 lbs more unballasted traction mass
  • CaseIH Steiger 500 provides +5 gpm higher base hydraulic flow (+13.5%)

Multi-Axis Capability Radar

Normalized 5-pillar operational benchmark comparison

CaseIH Steiger 500
Fendt 1165 MT
Engine PowerBallast MassHydraulicsDisplacementGear Versatility
Engine PowerRated Horsepower
500 HPvs637 HP
Ballast MassOperating Weight
39,492 lbsvs42,692 lbs
HydraulicsStandard Flow
42 gpmvs37 gpm
DisplacementEngine Liters
12.9 Lvs16.8 L
Gear VersatilitySpeeds / Range
16F / 2Rvs16F / 4R
FIELD PROVEN FOOTAGE SHOOTOUT

Dual Field Action & Powertrain Sound

Side-by-side operational field footage verified with computer vision & acoustic audits.

VLM Visual & Audio Audited
CaseIH Steiger 500
Case IH Steiger 500 Tractor Near Holcomb, Illinois on 4-24-2012
Case IH Steiger 500 Tractor Near Holcomb, Illinois on 4-24-2012
Takes (3):
Channel: Basicbill's Farming ChannelWatch on YouTube
Fendt 1165 MT
Трактор FENDT 1165 MT
Трактор FENDT 1165 MT
Takes (3):
Channel: VITTALYKS CHANNELWatch on YouTube

Head-to-Head Specification Differential

Side-by-side technical parameters with calculated delta advantage & percent differentials

SpecificationCaseIH Steiger 500Fendt 1165 MTAdvantage Delta
Power & Output
Rated Engine Horsepower
500 HP
637 HP
-
PTO Horsepower (Tested)
508 HP
N/A
-
Traction Density Ratio
12.7 HP/1k lbs
14.9 HP/1k lbs
14.9 vs 12.7 HP / 1,000 lb (higher transport agility)
Dimensions & Weight
Base Operating Weight
39,492 lbs
42,692 lbs
+8.1%+3,200 lbs heavier
Engine Specs
Displacement
12.9 L
16.8 L
+3.9L larger displacement
Cylinders
6 Cylinders
12 Cylinders
-
Hydraulics & Implements
Standard Hydraulic Pump Flow
42 gpm
37 gpm
+13.5%+5 gpm flow
Rear SCV Remotes (Standard)
4 Valves
6 Valves
+2 extra standard remote circuits
3-Point Hitch Category
Category 4N
Category IV/III
-
Chassis & Drivetrain
Drive Configuration
4WD
Tracks (Crawler)
-
Transmission System
full power shift
full power shift
-
✓Specifications independently cross-referenced with official OECD & Nebraska test codes.
Official Engineering Test Reports

Buyer Decision Export Tools

Export side-by-side data for forums, Excel spreadsheets, or dealer negotiations

AI MATCHUP ARBITER & FIELD WORKLOAD ADVISOR

Operational Field Verdict Matrix

Algorithmic suitability assessment cross-referencing Nebraska draft tests against four agricultural workloads.

Real-time Engineering Synthesis

Primary Tillage & Deep Chisel Plowing

Fendt Recommended

Fendt commands superior frame weight (+3,200 lbs) for continuous draft traction in heavy gumbo soils.

Tractive efficiency in heavy soil depends heavily on static axle load rather than pure unballasted horsepower.

Large-Scale Air Seeding & Hydraulic Drills

CaseIH Recommended

CaseIH offers continuous high-capacity hydraulic flow (42 gpm, +5 gpm advantage), effortlessly sustaining fan motors and down-pressure circuits simultaneously.

Variable-rate air carts require independent remote valve pressure regulation without starving steering hydraulics.

Road Hauling & Grain Cart Chase Duty

Fendt Recommended

Fendt 1165 MT offers superior 14.92 HP/1,000 lb agility, reducing road fuel overhead on rapid grain bin transit cycles.

Higher agility power-to-weight ratios dramatically improve turnaround times during peak harvesting windows.

Soil Compaction & Wet Ground Flotation

CaseIH Recommended

CaseIH Steiger 500 features a lighter footprint (-3,200 lbs), reducing deep subsoil compaction during damp spring planting windows.

Preserving soil porosity and preventing hardpan buildup saves diesel fuel in subsequent years.
Fleet Manager Recommendation

Select CaseIH Steiger 500 for superior hydraulic flow capacity across evaluated field tasks.

Evidence Coverage89%Empirical Spec Depth

Decision Analysis & Editorial Verdict

Engine Decision Verdict

CaseIH Steiger 500 holds the specification advantage across verified metrics. For heavy field draft tasks, evaluate Steiger 500; for operations sensitive to operating costs or implement compatibility, Fendt 1165 MT remains a direct benchmark contender.

COMMERCIAL INVENTORY & PRICING

Request Authorized Dealer Best Quote & Availability

Skip the runaround. Receive competitive manufacturer incentive packages, verified stock status, and freight estimates from top regional dealers.

100% Free service • No purchase obligation
Matched to certified OEM franchise dealers near your ZIP
Fast response with seasonal cash discount & low APR bundles

Your contact details are encrypted and only transmitted to authorized machinery dealers matching your location.

COMMERCIAL MACHINERY DECISION TOOL

Equipment Financing & Monthly Payment Estimator

Model cash flows, estimated installment burdens, and financing differentials for agricultural leases or loans.

Zero Credit Impact Estimate
$
Financed: $432,000 after down payment
$
Financed: $432,000 after down payment
Down Payment20%
0%20% (Standard)50%
Annual APR5.99%
Financing Term Duration (Months)
Estimated Monthly Payment Differential
CaseIH Steiger 500$8,350 /mo
60 payments$501,000 total
Fendt 1165 MT$8,350 /mo
60 payments$501,000 total
Estimated Monthly Delta:$0 /mo savings

*Indicative estimates based on standard Tier-1 agricultural commercial rates. Taxes, freight, attachments, and insurance not included.

Other Competitors in This Horsepower Tier

View All CaseIH Alternatives →
FendtFendt 1038 Vario380 HP
Compare with Steiger 500 →
ChallengerChallenger MT845380 HP
Compare with Steiger 500 →
DeereDeere 8345R (2014–2019)380 HP
Compare with Steiger 500 →