TRACTORCOMPARE.COM
Independent Agricultural Machinery Decision & Sizing Authority
CaseIH Puma 240 vs Fiat 1880
Specification differential, power-to-weight analysis, hydraulic benchmarks, and equipment decision guidance.
CaseIH Puma 240
Category: Farm • Production: 2014 -
Fiat 1880
Category: Farm
Decisive Performance Differentials
- CaseIH Puma 240 provides +66.6 PTO HP more implement shaft power
- CaseIH Puma 240 provides +3,350 lbs more unballasted traction mass
Multi-Axis Capability Radar
Normalized 5-pillar operational benchmark comparison
Dual Field Action & Powertrain Sound
Side-by-side operational field footage verified with computer vision & acoustic audits.
Head-to-Head Specification Differential
Side-by-side technical parameters with calculated delta advantage & percent differentials
| Specification | CaseIH Puma 240 | Fiat 1880 | Advantage Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| Power & Output | |||
Rated Engine Horsepower | 240 HP | 180 HP | - |
PTO Horsepower (Tested) | 228.6 HP | 162 HP | +41.1%+66.6 PTO HP (+41.1%) |
Traction Density Ratio | 14.3 HP/1k lbs | 13.4 HP/1k lbs | 14.3 vs 13.4 HP / 1,000 lb (higher transport agility) |
| Dimensions & Weight | |||
Base Operating Weight | 16,800 lbs | 13,450 lbs | +24.9%+3,350 lbs heavier |
| Engine Specs | |||
Displacement | 6.7 L | 8.1 L | +1.4L larger displacement |
Cylinders | 6 Cylinders | 6 Cylinders | - |
| Hydraulics & Implements | |||
Standard Hydraulic Pump Flow | 47 gpm | N/A (Check Option Pack) | - |
Rear SCV Remotes (Standard) | 3 Valves | 1 Valves | +2 extra standard remote circuits |
3-Point Hitch Category | Category II/IIIN | Category III | - |
| Chassis & Drivetrain | |||
Drive Configuration | 4WD | 4WD | - |
Transmission System | full power shift | creeper | - |
Buyer Decision Export Tools
Export side-by-side data for forums, Excel spreadsheets, or dealer negotiations
Operational Field Verdict Matrix
Algorithmic suitability assessment cross-referencing Nebraska draft tests against four agricultural workloads.
Primary Tillage & Deep Chisel Plowing
CaseIH delivers higher base frame ballast (+3,350 lbs) to minimize tire wheel slip under deep draft implement drag.
Large-Scale Air Seeding & Hydraulic Drills
Dedicated remote circuit hydraulic flow ratings are incomplete. Direct comparative seeding capacity requires dealer-verified option build sheets.
Road Hauling & Grain Cart Chase Duty
CaseIH Puma 240 has a sharper 14.29 HP/1,000 lb power-to-weight ratio for rapid hill-climbing acceleration with loaded grain carts.
Soil Compaction & Wet Ground Flotation
Fiat 1880 features a lighter footprint (-3,350 lbs), mitigating subsoil compaction and preserving soil porosity.
Select CaseIH Puma 240 for superior tractive frame ballast and engine power reserves across evaluated field tasks.
Decision Analysis & Editorial Verdict
CaseIH Puma 240 holds the specification advantage across verified metrics, led by higher rated horsepower. For heavy field draft tasks, evaluate Puma 240; for operations sensitive to operating costs or implement compatibility, Fiat 1880 remains a direct benchmark contender.
Request Authorized Dealer Best Quote & Availability
Skip the runaround. Receive competitive manufacturer incentive packages, verified stock status, and freight estimates from top regional dealers.
Equipment Financing & Monthly Payment Estimator
Model cash flows, estimated installment burdens, and financing differentials for agricultural leases or loans.
*Indicative estimates based on standard Tier-1 agricultural commercial rates. Taxes, freight, attachments, and insurance not included.