HEAD-TO-HEAD EQUIPMENT SHOWDOWN

CaseIH Puma 230 vs M-R-S A-85

Specification differential, power-to-weight analysis, hydraulic benchmarks, and equipment decision guidance.

Different Measurement ProtocolsMeasurement standard or power basis is unspecified for one or both machines.
CaseIH

CaseIH Puma 230

Category: Farm

CaseIH Puma 230
TRACTORCOMPARE.COM
Power269 HP
Weight19,800lbs
Pump Flow52gpm
M-R-S

M-R-S A-85

Category: Farm

M-R-S A-85
TRACTORCOMPARE.COM
Power202 HP
Weight17,300lbs
Pump FlowN/Agpm

Decisive Performance Differentials

  • CaseIH Puma 230 provides +2,500 lbs more unballasted traction mass

Multi-Axis Capability Radar

Normalized 5-pillar operational benchmark comparison

CaseIH Puma 230
M-R-S A-85
Engine PowerBallast MassHydraulicsDisplacementGear Versatility
Engine PowerRated Horsepower
269 HPvs202 HP
Ballast MassOperating Weight
19,800 lbsvs17,300 lbs
HydraulicsStandard Flow
52 gpmvsOption Pack Required
DisplacementEngine Liters
6.7 Lvs5.2 L
Gear VersatilitySpeeds / Range
CVT / Standardvs20F / 4R

Head-to-Head Specification Differential

Side-by-side technical parameters with calculated delta advantage & percent differentials

SpecificationCaseIH Puma 230M-R-S A-85Advantage Delta
Power & Output
Rated Engine Horsepower
269 HP
202 HP
-
PTO Horsepower (Tested)
218.5 HP
N/A
-
Traction Density Ratio
13.6 HP/1k lbs
11.7 HP/1k lbs
13.6 vs 11.7 HP / 1,000 lb (higher transport agility)
Dimensions & Weight
Base Operating Weight
19,800 lbs
17,300 lbs
+14.5%+2,500 lbs heavier
Engine Specs
Displacement
6.7 L
5.2 L
+1.5L larger displacement
Cylinders
6 Cylinders
6 Cylinders
-
Hydraulics & Implements
Standard Hydraulic Pump Flow
52 gpm
N/A (Check Option Pack)
-
Rear SCV Remotes (Standard)
3 Valves
Optional / Standard
-
3-Point Hitch Category
Category 2/3N
Standard Hitch
-
Chassis & Drivetrain
Drive Configuration
4WD
4WD
-
Transmission System
continuously variable transmission (CVT)
Mechanical / PowerShift
-
✓Specifications independently cross-referenced with official OECD & Nebraska test codes.
Official Engineering Test Reports

Buyer Decision Export Tools

Export side-by-side data for forums, Excel spreadsheets, or dealer negotiations

AI MATCHUP ARBITER & FIELD WORKLOAD ADVISOR

Operational Field Verdict Matrix

Algorithmic suitability assessment cross-referencing Nebraska draft tests against four agricultural workloads.

Real-time Engineering Synthesis

Primary Tillage & Deep Chisel Plowing

CaseIH Recommended

CaseIH delivers higher base frame ballast (+2,500 lbs) to minimize tire wheel slip under deep draft implement drag.

Tractive efficiency in heavy soil depends heavily on static axle load rather than pure unballasted horsepower.

Large-Scale Air Seeding & Hydraulic Drills

Data Inconclusive

Dedicated remote circuit hydraulic flow ratings are incomplete. Direct comparative seeding capacity requires dealer-verified option build sheets.

Variable-rate air carts require independent remote valve pressure regulation without starving steering hydraulics.

Road Hauling & Grain Cart Chase Duty

CaseIH Recommended

CaseIH Puma 230 has a sharper 13.59 HP/1,000 lb power-to-weight ratio for rapid hill-climbing acceleration with loaded grain carts.

Higher agility power-to-weight ratios dramatically improve turnaround times during peak harvesting windows.

Soil Compaction & Wet Ground Flotation

M-R-S Recommended

M-R-S A-85 features a lighter footprint (-2,500 lbs), mitigating subsoil compaction and preserving soil porosity.

Preserving soil porosity and preventing hardpan buildup saves diesel fuel in subsequent years.
Fleet Manager Recommendation

Both machines demonstrate balanced engineering trade-offs in this equipment class. Base final fleet acquisition on local dealer servicing support, operator ergonomics, and implement compatibility.

Evidence Coverage68%Empirical Spec Depth

Decision Analysis & Editorial Verdict

Engine Decision Verdict

Both CaseIH Puma 230 and M-R-S A-85 are remarkably well-matched within this power bracket. The decisive purchasing decision should focus on dealer proximity, local service network reputation, hydraulic circuit options, and implement hitch requirements.

COMMERCIAL INVENTORY & PRICING

Request Authorized Dealer Best Quote & Availability

Skip the runaround. Receive competitive manufacturer incentive packages, verified stock status, and freight estimates from top regional dealers.

100% Free service • No purchase obligation
Matched to certified OEM franchise dealers near your ZIP
Fast response with seasonal cash discount & low APR bundles

Your contact details are encrypted and only transmitted to authorized machinery dealers matching your location.

COMMERCIAL MACHINERY DECISION TOOL

Equipment Financing & Monthly Payment Estimator

Model cash flows, estimated installment burdens, and financing differentials for agricultural leases or loans.

Zero Credit Impact Estimate
$
Financed: $312,000 after down payment
$
Financed: $192,000 after down payment
Down Payment20%
0%20% (Standard)50%
Annual APR5.99%
Financing Term Duration (Months)
Estimated Monthly Payment Differential
CaseIH Puma 230$6,030 /mo
60 payments$361,800 total
M-R-S A-85$3,711 /mo
60 payments$222,660 total
Estimated Monthly Delta:$2,319 /mo savings

*Indicative estimates based on standard Tier-1 agricultural commercial rates. Taxes, freight, attachments, and insurance not included.

Other Competitors in This Horsepower Tier

View All CaseIH Alternatives →
FendtFendt 720 Vario208 HP
Compare with Puma 230 →
DeereDeere 4850207.9 HP
Compare with Puma 230 →
Massey FergusonMassey Ferguson 7S.210206.5 HP
Compare with Puma 230 →