HEAD-TO-HEAD EQUIPMENT SHOWDOWN

CaseIH Puma 195 vs County 1474

Specification differential, power-to-weight analysis, hydraulic benchmarks, and equipment decision guidance.

Different Measurement ProtocolsMeasurement standard or power basis is unspecified for one or both machines.
CaseIH
Spec Winner

CaseIH Puma 195

Category: Farm

CaseIH Puma 195
TRACTORCOMPARE.COM
Power195 HP
Weight15,708lbs
Pump Flow48.7gpm
County

County 1474

Category: Farm

County 1474
TRACTORCOMPARE.COM
Power146 HP
WeightN/Albs
Pump FlowN/Agpm

Decisive Performance Differentials

  • CaseIH Puma 195 provides +54.4 PTO HP more implement shaft power

Multi-Axis Capability Radar

Normalized 5-pillar operational benchmark comparison

CaseIH Puma 195
County 1474
Engine PowerBallast MassHydraulicsDisplacementGear Versatility
Engine PowerRated Horsepower
195 HPvs146 HP
Ballast MassOperating Weight
15,708 lbsvsNo Record
HydraulicsStandard Flow
48.7 gpmvsOption Pack Required
DisplacementEngine Liters
6.7 Lvs6.6 L
Gear VersatilitySpeeds / Range
19F / 6Rvs16F / 4R
FIELD PROVEN FOOTAGE SHOOTOUT

Dual Field Action & Powertrain Sound

Side-by-side operational field footage verified with computer vision & acoustic audits.

VLM Visual & Audio Audited
CaseIH Puma 195
Case IH PUMA 195 Tractor For Sale
Case IH PUMA 195 Tractor For Sale
Channel: TitanofHuronWatch on YouTube
County 1474
1976-79 Ford County 1474 Tractor at the 2024 Horsepower Rally
1976-79 Ford County 1474 Tractor at the 2024 Horsepower Rally
Channel: ScenicDrive ProductionsWatch on YouTube

Head-to-Head Specification Differential

Side-by-side technical parameters with calculated delta advantage & percent differentials

SpecificationCaseIH Puma 195County 1474Advantage Delta
Power & Output
Rated Engine Horsepower
195 HP
146 HP
-
PTO Horsepower (Tested)
189.4 HP
135 HP
+40.3%+54.4 PTO HP (+40.3%)
Traction Density Ratio
12.4 HP/1k lbs
N/A
-
Dimensions & Weight
Base Operating Weight
15,708 lbs
N/A
-
Engine Specs
Displacement
6.7 L
6.6 L
+0.1L larger displacement
Cylinders
6 Cylinders
6 Cylinders
-
Hydraulics & Implements
Standard Hydraulic Pump Flow
48.7 gpm
N/A (Check Option Pack)
-
Rear SCV Remotes (Standard)
3 Valves
Optional / Standard
-
3-Point Hitch Category
Category optional
Standard Hitch
-
Chassis & Drivetrain
Drive Configuration
2WD (Optional 4WD)
4WD
-
Transmission System
full power shift
Mechanical / PowerShift
-
✓Specifications independently cross-referenced with official OECD & Nebraska test codes.
Official Engineering Test Reports

Buyer Decision Export Tools

Export side-by-side data for forums, Excel spreadsheets, or dealer negotiations

AI MATCHUP ARBITER & FIELD WORKLOAD ADVISOR

Operational Field Verdict Matrix

Algorithmic suitability assessment cross-referencing Nebraska draft tests against four agricultural workloads.

Real-time Engineering Synthesis

Primary Tillage & Deep Chisel Plowing

Data Inconclusive

Comparative draft ballast analysis is unavailable due to missing unballasted operating weight specifications on one or both tractors.

Tractive efficiency in heavy soil depends heavily on static axle load rather than pure unballasted horsepower.

Large-Scale Air Seeding & Hydraulic Drills

Data Inconclusive

Dedicated remote circuit hydraulic flow ratings are incomplete. Direct comparative seeding capacity requires dealer-verified option build sheets.

Variable-rate air carts require independent remote valve pressure regulation without starving steering hydraulics.

Road Hauling & Grain Cart Chase Duty

Data Inconclusive

Insufficient operating weight or horsepower records to compute comparative road transport traction agility.

Higher agility power-to-weight ratios dramatically improve turnaround times during peak harvesting windows.

Soil Compaction & Wet Ground Flotation

Data Inconclusive

Chassis weight data missing on one or both units; ground footprint contact pressure cannot be responsibly determined.

Preserving soil porosity and preventing hardpan buildup saves diesel fuel in subsequent years.
Fleet Manager Recommendation

CaseIH Puma 195 holds a verified rated horsepower lead (195 HP vs 146 HP). However, essential operating ballast or auxiliary hydraulic pump ratings remain unrecorded for a definitive overall workload recommendation. Consult OEM dealer build sheets before pairing with demanding implements.

Evidence Coverage56%Empirical Spec Depth

Decision Analysis & Editorial Verdict

Engine Decision Verdict

CaseIH Puma 195 holds the specification advantage across verified metrics, led by higher rated horsepower. For heavy field draft tasks, evaluate Puma 195; for operations sensitive to operating costs or implement compatibility, County 1474 remains a direct benchmark contender.

COMMERCIAL INVENTORY & PRICING

Request Authorized Dealer Best Quote & Availability

Skip the runaround. Receive competitive manufacturer incentive packages, verified stock status, and freight estimates from top regional dealers.

100% Free service • No purchase obligation
Matched to certified OEM franchise dealers near your ZIP
Fast response with seasonal cash discount & low APR bundles

Your contact details are encrypted and only transmitted to authorized machinery dealers matching your location.

COMMERCIAL MACHINERY DECISION TOOL

Equipment Financing & Monthly Payment Estimator

Model cash flows, estimated installment burdens, and financing differentials for agricultural leases or loans.

Zero Credit Impact Estimate
$
Financed: $192,000 after down payment
$
Financed: $108,000 after down payment
Down Payment20%
0%20% (Standard)50%
Annual APR5.99%
Financing Term Duration (Months)
Estimated Monthly Payment Differential
CaseIH Puma 195$3,711 /mo
60 payments$222,660 total
County 1474$2,087 /mo
60 payments$125,220 total
Estimated Monthly Delta:$1,624 /mo savings

*Indicative estimates based on standard Tier-1 agricultural commercial rates. Taxes, freight, attachments, and insurance not included.

Other Competitors in This Horsepower Tier

View All CaseIH Alternatives →
ZetorZetor Crystal 150150 HP
Compare with Puma 195 →
ZetorZetor Crystal 150 HD150 HP
Compare with Puma 195 →
FendtFendt Favorit 515C150 HP
Compare with Puma 195 →