TractorCompare
TRACTORCOMPAREDecision & Matchup Arena
VS

TRACTORCOMPARE.COM

Independent Agricultural Machinery Decision & Sizing Authority

Document Type: Official Buyer's Comparison Spec Sheet
Testing Standards: Nebraska Tractor Test Laboratory (NTTL) / OECD
Status: Verified Engineering Data Archive
HEAD-TO-HEAD EQUIPMENT SHOWDOWN

CaseIH Puma 145 vs CaseIH Puma 200

Specification differential, power-to-weight analysis, hydraulic benchmarks, and equipment decision guidance.

Quick swap rival for Puma 145:vs Valtra T132(141 HP)vs Case 1270(141 HP)vs Deere 6130R (2015–2021)(141 HP)vs M-R-S A-80B(141 HP)
Different Measurement ProtocolsMeasurement standard or power basis is unspecified for one or both machines.
CaseIH

CaseIH Puma 145

Category: Farm

CaseIH Puma 145
TRACTORCOMPARE.COM
Power188 HP
Weight14,350lbs
Pump FlowN/Agpm
View Full Benchmark Profile →5 Alternatives
CaseIH
Spec Winner

CaseIH Puma 200

Category: Farm • Production: 2011 -

CaseIH Puma 200
TRACTORCOMPARE.COM
Power250 HP
Weight18,940lbs
Pump Flow49gpm
View Full Benchmark Profile →5 Alternatives

Decisive Performance Differentials

  • CaseIH Puma 200 provides +48.9 PTO HP more implement shaft power
  • CaseIH Puma 200 provides +4,590 lbs more unballasted traction mass

Multi-Axis Capability Radar

Normalized 5-pillar operational benchmark comparison

CaseIH Puma 145
CaseIH Puma 200
Engine PowerBallast MassHydraulicsDisplacementGear Versatility
Engine PowerRated Horsepower
188 HPvs250 HP
Ballast MassOperating Weight
14,350 lbsvs18,940 lbs
HydraulicsStandard Flow
Option Pack Requiredvs49 gpm
DisplacementEngine Liters
6.7 Lvs6.7 L
Gear VersatilitySpeeds / Range
19F / 6Rvs19F / 6R

Head-to-Head Specification Differential

Side-by-side technical parameters with calculated delta advantage & percent differentials

SpecificationCaseIH Puma 145CaseIH Puma 200Advantage Delta
Power & Output
Rated Engine Horsepower
188 HP
250 HP
-
PTO Horsepower (Tested)
149.8 HP
198.7 HP
+32.6%+48.9 PTO HP (+32.6%)
Traction Density Ratio
13.1 HP/1k lbs
13.2 HP/1k lbs
 Tie
Dimensions & Weight
Base Operating Weight
14,350 lbs
18,940 lbs
+32%+4,590 lbs heavier
Engine Specs
Displacement
6.7 L
6.7 L
 Tie
Cylinders
6 Cylinders
6 Cylinders
-
Hydraulics & Implements
Standard Hydraulic Pump Flow
N/A (Check Option Pack)
49 gpm
-
Rear SCV Remotes (Standard)
3 Valves
3 Valves
 Tie
3-Point Hitch Category
Category 2/3N
Category 2/3N
-
Chassis & Drivetrain
Drive Configuration
4WD
4WD
-
Transmission System
full power shift
full power shift
-
✓Specifications independently cross-referenced with official OECD & Nebraska test codes.
Official Engineering Test Reports

Buyer Decision Export Tools

Export side-by-side data for forums, Excel spreadsheets, or dealer negotiations

AI MATCHUP ARBITER & FIELD WORKLOAD ADVISOR

Operational Field Verdict Matrix

Algorithmic suitability assessment cross-referencing Nebraska draft tests against four agricultural workloads.

Real-time Engineering Synthesis

Primary Tillage & Deep Chisel Plowing

CaseIH Recommended

CaseIH commands superior frame weight (+4,590 lbs) for continuous draft traction in heavy gumbo soils.

Tractive efficiency in heavy soil depends heavily on static axle load rather than pure unballasted horsepower.

Large-Scale Air Seeding & Hydraulic Drills

Data Inconclusive

Dedicated remote circuit hydraulic flow ratings are incomplete. Direct comparative seeding capacity requires dealer-verified option build sheets.

Variable-rate air carts require independent remote valve pressure regulation without starving steering hydraulics.

Road Hauling & Grain Cart Chase Duty

Balanced Agility

Both tractors exhibit matched power-to-weight agility (13.1 vs 13.2 HP/1,000 lb).

Higher agility power-to-weight ratios dramatically improve turnaround times during peak harvesting windows.

Soil Compaction & Wet Ground Flotation

CaseIH Recommended

CaseIH Puma 145 features a lighter footprint (-4,590 lbs), reducing deep subsoil compaction during damp spring planting windows.

Preserving soil porosity and preventing hardpan buildup saves diesel fuel in subsequent years.
Fleet Manager Recommendation

Select CaseIH Puma 200 for superior tractive frame ballast and engine power reserves across evaluated field tasks.

Evidence Coverage80%Empirical Spec Depth

Decision Analysis & Editorial Verdict

Engine Decision Verdict

CaseIH Puma 200 holds the specification edge across verified benchmark criteria, led by higher rated horsepower. Consider Puma 200 for demanding high-capacity field duties, while CaseIH Puma 145 provides a competitive footprint for alternative duty cycles.

COMMERCIAL INVENTORY & PRICING

Request Authorized Dealer Best Quote & Availability

Skip the runaround. Receive competitive manufacturer incentive packages, verified stock status, and freight estimates from top regional dealers.

100% Free service • No purchase obligation
Matched to certified OEM franchise dealers near your ZIP
Fast response with seasonal cash discount & low APR bundles

Your contact details are encrypted and only transmitted to authorized machinery dealers matching your location.

COMMERCIAL MACHINERY DECISION TOOL

Equipment Financing & Monthly Payment Estimator

Model cash flows, estimated installment burdens, and financing differentials for agricultural leases or loans.

Zero Credit Impact Estimate
$
Financed: $192,000 after down payment
$
Financed: $192,000 after down payment
Down Payment20%
0%20% (Standard)50%
Annual APR5.99%
Financing Term Duration (Months)
Estimated Monthly Payment Differential
CaseIH Puma 145$3,711 /mo
60 payments$222,660 total
CaseIH Puma 200$3,711 /mo
60 payments$222,660 total
Estimated Monthly Delta:$0 /mo savings

*Indicative estimates based on standard Tier-1 agricultural commercial rates. Taxes, freight, attachments, and insurance not included.

Other Competitors in This Horsepower Tier

View All CaseIH Alternatives →
Deutz-FahrDeutz-Fahr 6140.4 TTV144 HP
Compare with Puma 145 →
LandiniLandini Legend 145 TDI144 HP
Compare with Puma 145 →
AGCOAGCO RT130144 HP
Compare with Puma 145 →