TractorCompare
TRACTORCOMPAREDecision & Matchup Arena
VS

TRACTORCOMPARE.COM

Independent Agricultural Machinery Decision & Sizing Authority

Document Type: Official Buyer's Comparison Spec Sheet
Testing Standards: Nebraska Tractor Test Laboratory (NTTL) / OECD
Status: Verified Engineering Data Archive
HEAD-TO-HEAD EQUIPMENT SHOWDOWN

CaseIH MX305 vs Fendt 728 Vario

Specification differential, power-to-weight analysis, hydraulic benchmarks, and equipment decision guidance.

Quick swap rival for MX305:vs Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 235(228 HP)vs Agrico 4+125(228 HP)vs Agrico 4+160(228 HP)vs Fendt 722 Vario(229 HP)
Different Measurement ProtocolsMeasurement standard or power basis is unspecified for one or both machines.
CaseIH
Spec Winner

CaseIH MX305

Category: Farm

CaseIH MX305
TRACTORCOMPARE.COM
Power304 HP
Weight21,585lbs
Pump Flow38.6gpm
View Full Benchmark Profile →5 Alternatives
Fendt

Fendt 728 Vario

Category: Farm • Production: 2023 -

Fendt 728 Vario
TRACTORCOMPARE.COM
Power296.4 HP
Weight21,275lbs
Pump Flow31.7gpm
View Full Benchmark Profile →5 Alternatives

Decisive Performance Differentials

  • CaseIH MX305 provides +310 lbs more unballasted traction mass
  • CaseIH MX305 provides +6.9 gpm higher base hydraulic flow (+21.8%)

Multi-Axis Capability Radar

Normalized 5-pillar operational benchmark comparison

CaseIH MX305
Fendt 728 Vario
Engine PowerBallast MassHydraulicsDisplacementGear Versatility
Engine PowerRated Horsepower
304 HPvs296.4 HP
Ballast MassOperating Weight
21,585 lbsvs21,275 lbs
HydraulicsStandard Flow
38.6 gpmvs31.7 gpm
DisplacementEngine Liters
8.9 Lvs7.5 L
Gear VersatilitySpeeds / Range
23F / 6RvsCVT / Standard

Head-to-Head Specification Differential

Side-by-side technical parameters with calculated delta advantage & percent differentials

SpecificationCaseIH MX305Fendt 728 VarioAdvantage Delta
Power & Output
Rated Engine Horsepower
304 HP
296.4 HP
-
PTO Horsepower (Tested)
299.7 HP
N/A
-
Traction Density Ratio
14.1 HP/1k lbs
13.9 HP/1k lbs
 Tie
Dimensions & Weight
Base Operating Weight
21,585 lbs
21,275 lbs
+1.5%+310 lbs heavier
Engine Specs
Displacement
8.9 L
7.5 L
+1.4L larger displacement
Cylinders
6 Cylinders
6 Cylinders
-
Hydraulics & Implements
Standard Hydraulic Pump Flow
38.6 gpm
31.7 gpm
+21.8%+6.9 gpm flow
Rear SCV Remotes (Standard)
3 Valves
1 Valves
+2 extra standard remote circuits
3-Point Hitch Category
Category III
Category II
-
Chassis & Drivetrain
Drive Configuration
4WD
4WD
-
Transmission System
Mechanical / PowerShift
continuously-variable transmission
-
✓Specifications independently cross-referenced with official OECD & Nebraska test codes.
Official Engineering Test Reports

Buyer Decision Export Tools

Export side-by-side data for forums, Excel spreadsheets, or dealer negotiations

AI MATCHUP ARBITER & FIELD WORKLOAD ADVISOR

Operational Field Verdict Matrix

Algorithmic suitability assessment cross-referencing Nebraska draft tests against four agricultural workloads.

Real-time Engineering Synthesis

Primary Tillage & Deep Chisel Plowing

Tied Match

Both tractors share comparable tractive ballast and engine torque profiles within 2% margin.

Tractive efficiency in heavy soil depends heavily on static axle load rather than pure unballasted horsepower.

Large-Scale Air Seeding & Hydraulic Drills

CaseIH Recommended

CaseIH offers continuous high-capacity hydraulic flow (38.6 gpm, +6.9 gpm advantage), effortlessly sustaining fan motors and down-pressure circuits simultaneously.

Variable-rate air carts require independent remote valve pressure regulation without starving steering hydraulics.

Road Hauling & Grain Cart Chase Duty

Balanced Agility

Both tractors exhibit matched power-to-weight agility (14.08 vs 13.93 HP/1,000 lb).

Higher agility power-to-weight ratios dramatically improve turnaround times during peak harvesting windows.

Soil Compaction & Wet Ground Flotation

Equivalent Footprint

Both machines present equivalent static chassis footprints within 3% tolerance.

Preserving soil porosity and preventing hardpan buildup saves diesel fuel in subsequent years.
Fleet Manager Recommendation

Select CaseIH MX305 for superior tractive frame ballast and engine power reserves and hydraulic flow capacity across evaluated field tasks.

Evidence Coverage85%Empirical Spec Depth

Decision Analysis & Editorial Verdict

Engine Decision Verdict

CaseIH MX305 holds the specification advantage across verified metrics, led by higher rated horsepower. For heavy field draft tasks, evaluate MX305; for operations sensitive to operating costs or implement compatibility, Fendt 728 Vario remains a direct benchmark contender.

COMMERCIAL INVENTORY & PRICING

Request Authorized Dealer Best Quote & Availability

Skip the runaround. Receive competitive manufacturer incentive packages, verified stock status, and freight estimates from top regional dealers.

100% Free service • No purchase obligation
Matched to certified OEM franchise dealers near your ZIP
Fast response with seasonal cash discount & low APR bundles

Your contact details are encrypted and only transmitted to authorized machinery dealers matching your location.

COMMERCIAL MACHINERY DECISION TOOL

Equipment Financing & Monthly Payment Estimator

Model cash flows, estimated installment burdens, and financing differentials for agricultural leases or loans.

Zero Credit Impact Estimate
$
Financed: $312,000 after down payment
$
Financed: $312,000 after down payment
Down Payment20%
0%20% (Standard)50%
Annual APR5.99%
Financing Term Duration (Months)
Estimated Monthly Payment Differential
CaseIH MX305$6,030 /mo
60 payments$361,800 total
Fendt 728 Vario$6,030 /mo
60 payments$361,800 total
Estimated Monthly Delta:$0 /mo savings

*Indicative estimates based on standard Tier-1 agricultural commercial rates. Taxes, freight, attachments, and insurance not included.

Other Competitors in This Horsepower Tier

View All CaseIH Alternatives →
ClaasClaas Axion 850 (2006–2023)232.5 HP
Compare with MX305 →
ClaasClaas 926232 HP
Compare with MX305 →
DeereDeere 7R 210231 HP
Compare with MX305 →