HEAD-TO-HEAD EQUIPMENT SHOWDOWN

CaseIH Farmall 75A (2010–2015) vs County 764 (1974–1976)

Specification differential, power-to-weight analysis, hydraulic benchmarks, and equipment decision guidance.

Different Measurement ProtocolsMeasurement standard or power basis is unspecified for one or both machines.
CaseIH

CaseIH Farmall 75A (2010–2015)

Category: Farm

CaseIH Farmall 75A (2010–2015)
TRACTORCOMPARE.COM
Power75 HP
Weight5,059lbs
Pump Flow18.7gpm
County

County 764 (1974–1976)

Category: Farm

County 764 (1974–1976)
TRACTORCOMPARE.COM
Power77 HP
Weight9,041lbs
Pump Flow9.2gpm

Decisive Performance Differentials

  • County 764 (1974–1976) provides +4.8 PTO HP more implement shaft power
  • County 764 (1974–1976) provides +3,982 lbs more unballasted traction mass
  • CaseIH Farmall 75A (2010–2015) provides +9.5 gpm higher base hydraulic flow (+103.3%)

Multi-Axis Capability Radar

Normalized 5-pillar operational benchmark comparison

CaseIH Farmall 75A (2010–2015)
County 764 (1974–1976)
Engine PowerBallast MassHydraulicsDisplacementGear Versatility
Engine PowerRated Horsepower
75 HPvs77 HP
Ballast MassOperating Weight
5,059 lbsvs9,041 lbs
HydraulicsStandard Flow
18.7 gpmvs9.2 gpm
DisplacementEngine Liters
3.2 Lvs4.2 L
Gear VersatilitySpeeds / Range
8F / 2Rvs8F / 2R
FIELD PROVEN FOOTAGE SHOOTOUT

Dual Field Action & Powertrain Sound

Side-by-side operational field footage verified with computer vision & acoustic audits.

VLM Visual & Audio Audited
CaseIH Farmall 75A (2010–2015)
Farmall 75A Walkaround
Farmall 75A Walkaround
Takes (3):
Channel: Case IH North AmericaWatch on YouTube
County 764 (1974–1976)
County 764
County 764
Takes (3):
Channel: Gavin StrangWatch on YouTube

Head-to-Head Specification Differential

Side-by-side technical parameters with calculated delta advantage & percent differentials

SpecificationCaseIH Farmall 75A (2010–2015)County 764 (1974–1976)Advantage Delta
Power & Output
Rated Engine Horsepower
75 HP
77 HP
-
PTO Horsepower (Tested)
68.2 HP
73 HP
+7%+4.8 PTO HP (+7%)
Traction Density Ratio
14.8 HP/1k lbs
8.5 HP/1k lbs
14.8 vs 8.5 HP / 1,000 lb (higher transport agility)
Dimensions & Weight
Base Operating Weight
5,059 lbs
9,041 lbs
+78.7%+3,982 lbs heavier
Engine Specs
Displacement
3.2 L
4.2 L
+1L larger displacement
Cylinders
4 Cylinders
4 Cylinders
-
Hydraulics & Implements
Standard Hydraulic Pump Flow
18.7 gpm
9.2 gpm
+103.3%+9.5 gpm flow
Rear SCV Remotes (Standard)
1 Valves
Optional / Standard
-
3-Point Hitch Category
Category 2/1
Category II
-
Chassis & Drivetrain
Drive Configuration
4WD
4WD
-
Transmission System
partially synchronized
gear
-
✓Specifications independently cross-referenced with official OECD & Nebraska test codes.
Official Engineering Test Reports

Buyer Decision Export Tools

Export side-by-side data for forums, Excel spreadsheets, or dealer negotiations

AI MATCHUP ARBITER & FIELD WORKLOAD ADVISOR

Operational Field Verdict Matrix

Algorithmic suitability assessment cross-referencing Nebraska draft tests against four agricultural workloads.

Real-time Engineering Synthesis

Primary Tillage & Deep Chisel Plowing

County Recommended

County commands superior frame weight (+3,982 lbs) for continuous draft traction in heavy gumbo soils.

Tractive efficiency in heavy soil depends heavily on static axle load rather than pure unballasted horsepower.

Large-Scale Air Seeding & Hydraulic Drills

CaseIH Recommended

CaseIH offers continuous high-capacity hydraulic flow (18.7 gpm, +9.5 gpm advantage), effortlessly sustaining fan motors and down-pressure circuits simultaneously.

Variable-rate air carts require independent remote valve pressure regulation without starving steering hydraulics.

Road Hauling & Grain Cart Chase Duty

CaseIH Recommended

CaseIH Farmall 75A (2010–2015) has a sharper 14.83 HP/1,000 lb power-to-weight ratio for rapid hill-climbing acceleration with loaded grain carts.

Higher agility power-to-weight ratios dramatically improve turnaround times during peak harvesting windows.

Soil Compaction & Wet Ground Flotation

CaseIH Recommended

CaseIH Farmall 75A (2010–2015) features a lighter footprint (-3,982 lbs), reducing deep subsoil compaction during damp spring planting windows.

Preserving soil porosity and preventing hardpan buildup saves diesel fuel in subsequent years.
Fleet Manager Recommendation

Both machines demonstrate balanced engineering trade-offs in this equipment class. Base final fleet acquisition on local dealer servicing support, operator ergonomics, and implement compatibility.

Evidence Coverage96%Empirical Spec Depth

Decision Analysis & Editorial Verdict

Engine Decision Verdict

Both CaseIH Farmall 75A (2010–2015) and County 764 (1974–1976) are remarkably well-matched within this power bracket. The decisive purchasing decision should focus on dealer proximity, local service network reputation, hydraulic circuit options, and implement hitch requirements.

COMMERCIAL INVENTORY & PRICING

Request Authorized Dealer Best Quote & Availability

Skip the runaround. Receive competitive manufacturer incentive packages, verified stock status, and freight estimates from top regional dealers.

100% Free service • No purchase obligation
Matched to certified OEM franchise dealers near your ZIP
Fast response with seasonal cash discount & low APR bundles

Your contact details are encrypted and only transmitted to authorized machinery dealers matching your location.

COMMERCIAL MACHINERY DECISION TOOL

Equipment Financing & Monthly Payment Estimator

Model cash flows, estimated installment burdens, and financing differentials for agricultural leases or loans.

Zero Credit Impact Estimate
$
Financed: $60,000 after down payment
$
Financed: $60,000 after down payment
Down Payment20%
0%20% (Standard)50%
Annual APR5.99%
Financing Term Duration (Months)
Estimated Monthly Payment Differential
CaseIH Farmall 75A (2010–2015)$1,160 /mo
60 payments$69,600 total
County 764 (1974–1976)$1,160 /mo
60 payments$69,600 total
Estimated Monthly Delta:$0 /mo savings

*Indicative estimates based on standard Tier-1 agricultural commercial rates. Taxes, freight, attachments, and insurance not included.

Other Competitors in This Horsepower Tier

View All CaseIH Alternatives →
Allis ChalmersAllis Chalmers HD657 HP
Compare with Farmall 75A →
BelarusBelarus 400A57 HP
Compare with Farmall 75A →
BelarusBelarus 405A57 HP
Compare with Farmall 75A →