HEAD-TO-HEAD EQUIPMENT SHOWDOWN

Cameco 345-B vs Massey Ferguson 3690

Specification differential, power-to-weight analysis, hydraulic benchmarks, and equipment decision guidance.

Different Measurement ProtocolsMeasurement standard or power basis is unspecified for one or both machines.
Cameco

Cameco 345-B

Category: Farm

Cameco 345-B
TRACTORCOMPARE.COM
Power250 HP
Weight23,400lbs
Pump FlowN/Agpm
Massey Ferguson

Massey Ferguson 3690

Category: Farm

Massey Ferguson 3690
TRACTORCOMPARE.COM
Power188 HP
Weight13,073lbs
Pump FlowN/Agpm

Decisive Performance Differentials

  • Cameco 345-B provides +10,327 lbs more unballasted traction mass

Multi-Axis Capability Radar

Normalized 5-pillar operational benchmark comparison

Cameco 345-B
Massey Ferguson 3690
Engine PowerBallast MassHydraulicsDisplacementGear Versatility
Engine PowerRated Horsepower
250 HPvs188 HP
Ballast MassOperating Weight
23,400 lbsvs13,073 lbs
HydraulicsStandard Flow
Option Pack RequiredvsOption Pack Required
DisplacementEngine Liters
10.5 Lvs7.4 L
Gear VersatilitySpeeds / Range
10F / 2Rvs32F / 0R
FIELD PROVEN FOOTAGE SHOOTOUT

Dual Field Action & Powertrain Sound

Side-by-side operational field footage verified with computer vision & acoustic audits.

VLM Visual & Audio Audited
Cameco 345-B
Field footage queue pending reviewNebraska test report laboratory acoustics available in spec card
Massey Ferguson 3690
MF 3690 vs MF 3690
MF 3690 vs MF 3690
Channel: MF3690_PROJECT Watch on YouTube

Head-to-Head Specification Differential

Side-by-side technical parameters with calculated delta advantage & percent differentials

SpecificationCameco 345-BMassey Ferguson 3690Advantage Delta
Power & Output
Rated Engine Horsepower
250 HP
188 HP
-
PTO Horsepower (Tested)
N/A
170 HP
-
Traction Density Ratio
10.7 HP/1k lbs
14.4 HP/1k lbs
14.4 vs 10.7 HP / 1,000 lb (higher transport agility)
Dimensions & Weight
Base Operating Weight
23,400 lbs
13,073 lbs
+79%+10,327 lbs heavier
Engine Specs
Displacement
10.5 L
7.4 L
+3.1L larger displacement
Cylinders
6 Cylinders
6 Cylinders
-
Chassis & Drivetrain
Drive Configuration
4WD
4WD
-
Transmission System
power shift
two-speed power shift
-
Hydraulics & Implements
Rear SCV Remotes (Standard)
2 Valves
2 Valves
Tie
3-Point Hitch Category
Category III Opt Optional
Category III
-
✓Specifications independently cross-referenced with official OECD & Nebraska test codes.
Official Engineering Test Reports

Buyer Decision Export Tools

Export side-by-side data for forums, Excel spreadsheets, or dealer negotiations

AI MATCHUP ARBITER & FIELD WORKLOAD ADVISOR

Operational Field Verdict Matrix

Algorithmic suitability assessment cross-referencing Nebraska draft tests against four agricultural workloads.

Real-time Engineering Synthesis

Primary Tillage & Deep Chisel Plowing

Cameco Recommended

Cameco delivers higher base frame ballast (+10,327 lbs) to minimize tire wheel slip under deep draft implement drag.

Tractive efficiency in heavy soil depends heavily on static axle load rather than pure unballasted horsepower.

Large-Scale Air Seeding & Hydraulic Drills

Data Inconclusive

Dedicated remote circuit hydraulic flow ratings are incomplete. Direct comparative seeding capacity requires dealer-verified option build sheets.

Variable-rate air carts require independent remote valve pressure regulation without starving steering hydraulics.

Road Hauling & Grain Cart Chase Duty

Massey Ferguson Recommended

Massey Ferguson 3690 offers superior 14.38 HP/1,000 lb agility, reducing road fuel overhead on rapid grain bin transit cycles.

Higher agility power-to-weight ratios dramatically improve turnaround times during peak harvesting windows.

Soil Compaction & Wet Ground Flotation

Massey Ferguson Recommended

Massey Ferguson 3690 features a lighter footprint (-10,327 lbs), mitigating subsoil compaction and preserving soil porosity.

Preserving soil porosity and preventing hardpan buildup saves diesel fuel in subsequent years.
Fleet Manager Recommendation

Both machines demonstrate balanced engineering trade-offs in this equipment class. Base final fleet acquisition on local dealer servicing support, operator ergonomics, and implement compatibility.

Evidence Coverage72%Empirical Spec Depth

Decision Analysis & Editorial Verdict

Engine Decision Verdict

Both Cameco 345-B and Massey Ferguson 3690 are remarkably well-matched within this power bracket. The decisive purchasing decision should focus on dealer proximity, local service network reputation, hydraulic circuit options, and implement hitch requirements.

COMMERCIAL INVENTORY & PRICING

Request Authorized Dealer Best Quote & Availability

Skip the runaround. Receive competitive manufacturer incentive packages, verified stock status, and freight estimates from top regional dealers.

100% Free service • No purchase obligation
Matched to certified OEM franchise dealers near your ZIP
Fast response with seasonal cash discount & low APR bundles

Your contact details are encrypted and only transmitted to authorized machinery dealers matching your location.

COMMERCIAL MACHINERY DECISION TOOL

Equipment Financing & Monthly Payment Estimator

Model cash flows, estimated installment burdens, and financing differentials for agricultural leases or loans.

Zero Credit Impact Estimate
$
Financed: $192,000 after down payment
$
Financed: $192,000 after down payment
Down Payment20%
0%20% (Standard)50%
Annual APR5.99%
Financing Term Duration (Months)
Estimated Monthly Payment Differential
Cameco 345-B$3,711 /mo
60 payments$222,660 total
Massey Ferguson 3690$3,711 /mo
60 payments$222,660 total
Estimated Monthly Delta:$0 /mo savings

*Indicative estimates based on standard Tier-1 agricultural commercial rates. Taxes, freight, attachments, and insurance not included.

Other Competitors in This Horsepower Tier

View All Cameco Alternatives →
FendtFendt Favorit 818190 HP
Compare with 345-B →
FiatFiat G190190 HP
Compare with 345-B →
ValtraValtra T173190 HP
Compare with 345-B →