HEAD-TO-HEAD EQUIPMENT SHOWDOWN

Bad Boy 1025 vs Marshall 264

Specification differential, power-to-weight analysis, hydraulic benchmarks, and equipment decision guidance.

Different Measurement ProtocolsMeasurement standard or power basis is unspecified for one or both machines.
Bad Boy

Bad Boy 1025

Category: Farm • Production: 2022 -

Bad Boy 1025
TRACTORCOMPARE.COM
Power24.6 HP
Weight1,638lbs
Pump Flow7gpm
Marshall

Marshall 264

Category: Farm

Marshall 264
TRACTORCOMPARE.COM
Power25.8 HP
Weight1,545lbs
Pump FlowN/Agpm

Multi-Axis Capability Radar

Normalized 5-pillar operational benchmark comparison

Bad Boy 1025
Marshall 264
Engine PowerBallast MassHydraulicsDisplacementGear Versatility
Engine PowerRated Horsepower
24.6 HPvs25.8 HP
Ballast MassOperating Weight
1,638 lbsvs1,545 lbs
HydraulicsStandard Flow
7 gpmvsOption Pack Required
DisplacementEngine Liters
1.3 Lvs1.1 L
Gear VersatilitySpeeds / Range
CVT / Standardvs12F / 6R
FIELD PROVEN FOOTAGE SHOOTOUT

Dual Field Action & Powertrain Sound

Side-by-side operational field footage verified with computer vision & acoustic audits.

VLM Visual & Audio Audited
Bad Boy 1025
BAD BOY 1025 IN-DEPTH
BAD BOY 1025 IN-DEPTH
Takes (3):
Channel: Dino Equipment & OutdoorsWatch on YouTube
Marshall 264
Audited Laboratory Acoustic SpecDirect field recording is undergoing computer vision verification. Audited Nebraska decibel acoustic metrics available in the benchmark table.

Head-to-Head Specification Differential

Side-by-side technical parameters with calculated delta advantage & percent differentials

SpecificationBad Boy 1025Marshall 264Advantage Delta
Power & Output
Rated Engine Horsepower
24.6 HP
25.8 HP
-
PTO Horsepower (Tested)
18.8 HP
N/A
-
Traction Density Ratio
15 HP/1k lbs
16.7 HP/1k lbs
16.7 vs 15 HP / 1,000 lb (higher transport agility)
Dimensions & Weight
Base Operating Weight
1,638 lbs
1,545 lbs
Tie
Engine Specs
Displacement
1.3 L
1.1 L
+0.2L larger displacement
Cylinders
3 Cylinders
2 Cylinders
-
Hydraulics & Implements
Standard Hydraulic Pump Flow
7 gpm
N/A (Check Option Pack)
-
Rear SCV Remotes (Standard)
Optional / Standard
2 Valves
-
3-Point Hitch Category
Category IN
Category I
-
Chassis & Drivetrain
Drive Configuration
4WD
4WD
-
Transmission System
hydrostatic
gear
-
✓Specifications independently cross-referenced with official OECD & Nebraska test codes.
Official Engineering Test Reports

Buyer Decision Export Tools

Export side-by-side data for forums, Excel spreadsheets, or dealer negotiations

AI MATCHUP ARBITER & FIELD WORKLOAD ADVISOR

Operational Field Verdict Matrix

Algorithmic suitability assessment cross-referencing Nebraska draft tests against four agricultural workloads.

Real-time Engineering Synthesis

Primary Tillage & Deep Chisel Plowing

Tied Match

Both tractors share comparable tractive ballast and engine torque profiles within 2% margin.

Tractive efficiency in heavy soil depends heavily on static axle load rather than pure unballasted horsepower.

Large-Scale Air Seeding & Hydraulic Drills

Data Inconclusive

Dedicated remote circuit hydraulic flow ratings are incomplete. Direct comparative seeding capacity requires dealer-verified option build sheets.

Variable-rate air carts require independent remote valve pressure regulation without starving steering hydraulics.

Road Hauling & Grain Cart Chase Duty

Marshall Recommended

Marshall 264 offers superior 16.7 HP/1,000 lb agility, reducing road fuel overhead on rapid grain bin transit cycles.

Higher agility power-to-weight ratios dramatically improve turnaround times during peak harvesting windows.

Soil Compaction & Wet Ground Flotation

Marshall Recommended

Marshall 264 features a lighter footprint (-93 lbs), mitigating subsoil compaction and preserving soil porosity.

Preserving soil porosity and preventing hardpan buildup saves diesel fuel in subsequent years.
Fleet Manager Recommendation

Both machines demonstrate balanced engineering trade-offs in this equipment class. Base final fleet acquisition on local dealer servicing support, operator ergonomics, and implement compatibility.

Evidence Coverage72%Empirical Spec Depth

Decision Analysis & Editorial Verdict

Engine Decision Verdict

Both Bad Boy 1025 and Marshall 264 are remarkably well-matched within this power bracket. The decisive purchasing decision should focus on dealer proximity, local service network reputation, hydraulic circuit options, and implement hitch requirements.

COMMERCIAL INVENTORY & PRICING

Request Authorized Dealer Best Quote & Availability

Skip the runaround. Receive competitive manufacturer incentive packages, verified stock status, and freight estimates from top regional dealers.

100% Free service • No purchase obligation
Matched to certified OEM franchise dealers near your ZIP
Fast response with seasonal cash discount & low APR bundles

Your contact details are encrypted and only transmitted to authorized machinery dealers matching your location.

COMMERCIAL MACHINERY DECISION TOOL

Equipment Financing & Monthly Payment Estimator

Model cash flows, estimated installment burdens, and financing differentials for agricultural leases or loans.

Zero Credit Impact Estimate
$
Financed: $19,200 after down payment
$
Financed: $19,200 after down payment
Down Payment20%
0%20% (Standard)50%
Annual APR5.99%
Financing Term Duration (Months)
Estimated Monthly Payment Differential
Bad Boy 1025$371 /mo
60 payments$22,260 total
Marshall 264$371 /mo
60 payments$22,260 total
Estimated Monthly Delta:$0 /mo savings

*Indicative estimates based on standard Tier-1 agricultural commercial rates. Taxes, freight, attachments, and insurance not included.

Other Competitors in This Horsepower Tier

View All Bad Boy Alternatives →
BransonBranson 190519 HP
Compare with 1025 →
ZetorZetor Primo HT2019 HP
Compare with 1025 →
FendtFendt Fix 219 HP
Compare with 1025 →