HEAD-TO-HEAD EQUIPMENT SHOWDOWN

Agrico 4+200 vs CaseIH STX375QT

Specification differential, power-to-weight analysis, hydraulic benchmarks, and equipment decision guidance.

Different Measurement ProtocolsMeasurement standard or power basis is unspecified for one or both machines.
Agrico

Agrico 4+200

Category: Farm • Production: unknown

Agrico 4+200
TRACTORCOMPARE.COM
Power283 HP
Weight35,270lbs
Pump FlowN/Agpm
CaseIH

CaseIH STX375QT

Category: Farm

CaseIH STX375QT
TRACTORCOMPARE.COM
Power375 HP
WeightN/Albs
Pump FlowN/Agpm

Multi-Axis Capability Radar

Normalized 5-pillar operational benchmark comparison

Agrico 4+200
CaseIH STX375QT
Engine PowerBallast MassHydraulicsDisplacementGear Versatility
Engine PowerRated Horsepower
283 HPvs375 HP
Ballast MassOperating Weight
35,270 lbsvsNo Record
HydraulicsStandard Flow
Option Pack RequiredvsOption Pack Required
DisplacementEngine Liters
12.7 Lvs15 L
Gear VersatilitySpeeds / Range
CVT / Standardvs16F / 2R

Head-to-Head Specification Differential

Side-by-side technical parameters with calculated delta advantage & percent differentials

SpecificationAgrico 4+200CaseIH STX375QTAdvantage Delta
Power & Output
Rated Engine Horsepower
283 HP
375 HP
-
PTO Horsepower (Tested)
N/A
330 HP
-
Traction Density Ratio
8 HP/1k lbs
N/A
-
Dimensions & Weight
Base Operating Weight
35,270 lbs
N/A
-
Engine Specs
Displacement
12.7 L
15 L
+2.3L larger displacement
Cylinders
6 Cylinders
6 Cylinders
-
Chassis & Drivetrain
Drive Configuration
4WD
Tracks (4-Track)
-
Transmission System
Mechanical / PowerShift
full power shift
-
Hydraulics & Implements
Rear SCV Remotes (Standard)
Optional / Standard
4 Valves
-
3-Point Hitch Category
Standard Hitch
Category IVN/III
-
✓Specifications independently cross-referenced with official OECD & Nebraska test codes.
Official Engineering Test Reports

Buyer Decision Export Tools

Export side-by-side data for forums, Excel spreadsheets, or dealer negotiations

AI MATCHUP ARBITER & FIELD WORKLOAD ADVISOR

Operational Field Verdict Matrix

Algorithmic suitability assessment cross-referencing Nebraska draft tests against four agricultural workloads.

Real-time Engineering Synthesis

Primary Tillage & Deep Chisel Plowing

Data Inconclusive

Comparative draft ballast analysis is unavailable due to missing unballasted operating weight specifications on one or both tractors.

Tractive efficiency in heavy soil depends heavily on static axle load rather than pure unballasted horsepower.

Large-Scale Air Seeding & Hydraulic Drills

Data Inconclusive

Dedicated remote circuit hydraulic flow ratings are incomplete. Direct comparative seeding capacity requires dealer-verified option build sheets.

Variable-rate air carts require independent remote valve pressure regulation without starving steering hydraulics.

Road Hauling & Grain Cart Chase Duty

Data Inconclusive

Insufficient operating weight or horsepower records to compute comparative road transport traction agility.

Higher agility power-to-weight ratios dramatically improve turnaround times during peak harvesting windows.

Soil Compaction & Wet Ground Flotation

Data Inconclusive

Chassis weight data missing on one or both units; ground footprint contact pressure cannot be responsibly determined.

Preserving soil porosity and preventing hardpan buildup saves diesel fuel in subsequent years.
Fleet Manager Recommendation

CaseIH STX375QT holds a verified rated horsepower lead (375 HP vs 283 HP). However, essential operating ballast or auxiliary hydraulic pump ratings remain unrecorded for a definitive overall workload recommendation. Consult OEM dealer build sheets before pairing with demanding implements.

Evidence Coverage48%Empirical Spec Depth

Decision Analysis & Editorial Verdict

Engine Decision Verdict

Both Agrico 4+200 and CaseIH STX375QT are remarkably well-matched within this power bracket. The decisive purchasing decision should focus on dealer proximity, local service network reputation, hydraulic circuit options, and implement hitch requirements.

COMMERCIAL INVENTORY & PRICING

Request Authorized Dealer Best Quote & Availability

Skip the runaround. Receive competitive manufacturer incentive packages, verified stock status, and freight estimates from top regional dealers.

100% Free service • No purchase obligation
Matched to certified OEM franchise dealers near your ZIP
Fast response with seasonal cash discount & low APR bundles

Your contact details are encrypted and only transmitted to authorized machinery dealers matching your location.

COMMERCIAL MACHINERY DECISION TOOL

Equipment Financing & Monthly Payment Estimator

Model cash flows, estimated installment burdens, and financing differentials for agricultural leases or loans.

Zero Credit Impact Estimate
$
Financed: $312,000 after down payment
$
Financed: $312,000 after down payment
Down Payment20%
0%20% (Standard)50%
Annual APR5.99%
Financing Term Duration (Months)
Estimated Monthly Payment Differential
Agrico 4+200$6,030 /mo
60 payments$361,800 total
CaseIH STX375QT$6,030 /mo
60 payments$361,800 total
Estimated Monthly Delta:$0 /mo savings

*Indicative estimates based on standard Tier-1 agricultural commercial rates. Taxes, freight, attachments, and insurance not included.

Other Competitors in This Horsepower Tier

View All Agrico Alternatives →
AGCO AllisAGCO Allis 9690216 HP
Compare with 4+200 →
AGCO AllisAGCO Allis 9695216 HP
Compare with 4+200 →
CaseIHCaseIH 7140216 HP
Compare with 4+200 →