HEAD-TO-HEAD EQUIPMENT SHOWDOWN

AGCO RT155A vs CaseIH Maxxum 140

Specification differential, power-to-weight analysis, hydraulic benchmarks, and equipment decision guidance.

Different Measurement ProtocolsMeasurement standard or power basis is unspecified for one or both machines.
AGCO

AGCO RT155A

Category: Farm

AGCO RT155A
TRACTORCOMPARE.COM
Power185 HP
Weight14,300lbs
Pump Flow29gpm
CaseIH

CaseIH Maxxum 140

Category: Farm

CaseIH Maxxum 140
TRACTORCOMPARE.COM
Power139 HP
Weight10,912lbs
Pump Flow37gpm

Decisive Performance Differentials

  • AGCO RT155A provides +49.7 PTO HP more implement shaft power
  • AGCO RT155A provides +3,388 lbs more unballasted traction mass
  • CaseIH Maxxum 140 provides +8 gpm higher base hydraulic flow (+27.6%)

Multi-Axis Capability Radar

Normalized 5-pillar operational benchmark comparison

AGCO RT155A
CaseIH Maxxum 140
Engine PowerBallast MassHydraulicsDisplacementGear Versatility
Engine PowerRated Horsepower
185 HPvs139 HP
Ballast MassOperating Weight
14,300 lbsvs10,912 lbs
HydraulicsStandard Flow
29 gpmvs37 gpm
DisplacementEngine Liters
6.6 Lvs6.7 L
Gear VersatilitySpeeds / Range
24F / 0Rvs17F / 16R
FIELD PROVEN FOOTAGE SHOOTOUT

Dual Field Action & Powertrain Sound

Side-by-side operational field footage verified with computer vision & acoustic audits.

VLM Visual & Audio Audited
AGCO RT155A
2010 AGCO RT155A For Sale
2010 AGCO RT155A For Sale
Channel: TractorHouseWatch on YouTube
CaseIH Maxxum 140
Case IH Maxxum 140 Tractor
Case IH Maxxum 140 Tractor
Channel: G.M. Stephenson LtdWatch on YouTube

Head-to-Head Specification Differential

Side-by-side technical parameters with calculated delta advantage & percent differentials

SpecificationAGCO RT155ACaseIH Maxxum 140Advantage Delta
Power & Output
Rated Engine Horsepower
185 HP
139 HP
-
PTO Horsepower (Tested)
190 HP
140.3 HP
+35.4%+49.7 PTO HP (+35.4%)
Traction Density Ratio
12.9 HP/1k lbs
12.7 HP/1k lbs
Tie
Dimensions & Weight
Base Operating Weight
14,300 lbs
10,912 lbs
+31%+3,388 lbs heavier
Engine Specs
Displacement
6.6 L
6.7 L
+0.1L larger displacement
Cylinders
6 Cylinders
6 Cylinders
-
Hydraulics & Implements
Standard Hydraulic Pump Flow
29 gpm
37 gpm
+27.6%+8 gpm flow
Rear SCV Remotes (Standard)
3 Valves
2 Valves
+1 extra standard remote circuits
3-Point Hitch Category
Category 2/3 Opt Optional
Category II Opt Optional
-
Chassis & Drivetrain
Drive Configuration
4WD
4WD
-
Transmission System
partial power shift
partial power shift
-
✓Specifications independently cross-referenced with official OECD & Nebraska test codes.
Official Engineering Test Reports

Buyer Decision Export Tools

Export side-by-side data for forums, Excel spreadsheets, or dealer negotiations

AI MATCHUP ARBITER & FIELD WORKLOAD ADVISOR

Operational Field Verdict Matrix

Algorithmic suitability assessment cross-referencing Nebraska draft tests against four agricultural workloads.

Real-time Engineering Synthesis

Primary Tillage & Deep Chisel Plowing

AGCO Recommended

AGCO delivers higher base frame ballast (+3,388 lbs) to minimize tire wheel slip under deep draft implement drag.

Tractive efficiency in heavy soil depends heavily on static axle load rather than pure unballasted horsepower.

Large-Scale Air Seeding & Hydraulic Drills

CaseIH Recommended

CaseIH leads with enhanced hydraulic pump capacity (37 gpm, +8 gpm advantage), preventing hydraulic oil overheating on wide vacuum seeders.

Variable-rate air carts require independent remote valve pressure regulation without starving steering hydraulics.

Road Hauling & Grain Cart Chase Duty

Balanced Agility

Both tractors exhibit matched power-to-weight agility (12.94 vs 12.74 HP/1,000 lb).

Higher agility power-to-weight ratios dramatically improve turnaround times during peak harvesting windows.

Soil Compaction & Wet Ground Flotation

CaseIH Recommended

CaseIH Maxxum 140 features a lighter footprint (-3,388 lbs), mitigating subsoil compaction and preserving soil porosity.

Preserving soil porosity and preventing hardpan buildup saves diesel fuel in subsequent years.
Fleet Manager Recommendation

Both machines demonstrate balanced engineering trade-offs in this equipment class. Base final fleet acquisition on local dealer servicing support, operator ergonomics, and implement compatibility.

Evidence Coverage96%Empirical Spec Depth

Decision Analysis & Editorial Verdict

Engine Decision Verdict

Both AGCO RT155A and CaseIH Maxxum 140 are remarkably well-matched within this power bracket. The decisive purchasing decision should focus on dealer proximity, local service network reputation, hydraulic circuit options, and implement hitch requirements.

COMMERCIAL INVENTORY & PRICING

Request Authorized Dealer Best Quote & Availability

Skip the runaround. Receive competitive manufacturer incentive packages, verified stock status, and freight estimates from top regional dealers.

100% Free service • No purchase obligation
Matched to certified OEM franchise dealers near your ZIP
Fast response with seasonal cash discount & low APR bundles

Your contact details are encrypted and only transmitted to authorized machinery dealers matching your location.

COMMERCIAL MACHINERY DECISION TOOL

Equipment Financing & Monthly Payment Estimator

Model cash flows, estimated installment burdens, and financing differentials for agricultural leases or loans.

Zero Credit Impact Estimate
$
Financed: $192,000 after down payment
$
Financed: $108,000 after down payment
Down Payment20%
0%20% (Standard)50%
Annual APR5.99%
Financing Term Duration (Months)
Estimated Monthly Payment Differential
AGCO RT155A$3,711 /mo
60 payments$222,660 total
CaseIH Maxxum 140$2,087 /mo
60 payments$125,220 total
Estimated Monthly Delta:$1,624 /mo savings

*Indicative estimates based on standard Tier-1 agricultural commercial rates. Taxes, freight, attachments, and insurance not included.

Other Competitors in This Horsepower Tier

View All AGCO Alternatives →
ZetorZetor 14145140 HP
Compare with RT155A →
ZetorZetor 14245140 HP
Compare with RT155A →
FendtFendt Favorit 514C140 HP
Compare with RT155A →